STUDENT-CENETERED LEARNING AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CAREER DEVELOPMENT: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK This research PHDF-23-7515 has been supported by Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia (SRNSFG).

Main Article Content

Natia Gegelashvili

Abstract

In 2005, upon joining the Bologna process, one of the principal challenges faced by the Georgian education system was the integration of a student­-centered learning within Georgian higher education. Although a specific definition of student­-centered learning is not outlined, its primary objective is to cultivate a learning environment customized to the student's interests and capabilities. The Leuven/Louvain-­la­-Neuve Ministerial Communiqué underscores that student­-centered learning aids students in acquiring the skills crucial for navigating a dynamic labor market. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to develop a conceptual framework based on the narrative literature review, focusing on student-­centered learning and its influence on career success. Student­-centered learning comprises two core components. The first component pertains to the institutional conditions required for its introduction and implementation, while the second component encompasses innovative teaching methodologies. Through the conducted analysis, the skills acquired as a consequence of the student-centered approach, imperative for prospering in the labor market, were identified. These include problem­-solving abilities, creative and critical thinking, communication skills and teamwork. In addition to the skills acquired through student-­centered learning, influence on career success is exerted by various other factors. These encompass external (objective) and internal (subjective) criteria, along with variables related to human capital.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gegelashvili, N. (2026). STUDENT-CENETERED LEARNING AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CAREER DEVELOPMENT: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: This research PHDF-23-7515 has been supported by Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia (SRNSFG). Collection of Scientific Papers, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.52340/eeu.2024.01.06
Section
Article
Author Biography

Natia Gegelashvili, East European University

Doctoral student

Faculty of Education Sciences

East European University

Bookmark and Share

References

Abel, E., & Campbell, M. (2009). Student­Centred Learning in an Advanced Social Work Practice Course: Outcomes of a Mixed Methods Investigation. Social Work Education, 28:1, 3­17.

Arko­Cobbah, A. (2004). The Role of Libraries in Student­Centred Learning: The Case of Students from the Disadvantaged Communities in South Africa. The International Information and Library Review, 36, 263­271.

Arthur, M., & Rousseau, D. (1996). Career Lexicon for the 21st Century. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 10, 28­39.

Attard, A., Ioio, E. D., Geven, K., & Santa, R. (2010). Student centered learning: An insight into theory and practice. Bucharest: Education International.

Bologna. (2005). The European Higher Education Area – Achieving the Goals Communiqué of the Confer- ence of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Bergen, 19­20 May 2005. Bergen.

Bologna Process. (2009). The Bologna Process 2020: The European Higher Education Area in the New De- cade. (Leuven/Louvain­la­Neuve, The Bologna Process).

Deikelmann, N., & Lampe, S. (2004). Student­Centered Pedagogies: Co Creating Compelling Experiences Using the New Pedagogies. Teacher Talk: New Pedagogies for Nursing, 43:6, 245­247.

Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & Carlier, O. ( 2008). Career success: Constructing a multidimensional model. J. Vocat. Behav. 73, 254­267.

Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M., & Liden, R. (2004). Work Value Congruence and Intrinsic Career Success: The Compensatory Roles of Leader­Member Exchange and Perceived Organizational Support. Pers. Psy- chol. 57, 305­332.

Gelişli, Y. (2009). The effect of student centered instructional approaches on student success. TProcedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 1(1), 469­473.

Gibbs, P., Sharvashidze, G., Grdzelidze, I., Cherkezishvili, D., Sanikidze, T., Lazarashvili, G., & Tavadze, G. (2022). A study into Georgian universities’ approach to the national standards of quality for teaching and learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47:1, 59­71.

Gordon, S. J., Bolwell, C. F., Raney, J. L., & Zepke, N. (2022). Transforming a Didactic Lecture into a Stu- dent­Centered Active Learning Exercise — Teaching Equine Diarrhea to Fourth­Year Veterinary Stu- dents. Education Sciences (12) 68, 1­14.

Jaskolka, G., Beyer, J., & Trice, H. (1985). Measuring and predicting managerial success. J. Vocat. Behav.

26, 189–205.

Kaput, K. (2018). Evidence for Student­Centered Learning. Saint Paul: MN: Education Evolving.

Kassem, H. M. (2019). The Impact of Student­Centered Instruction on EFL Learners’ Affect and Achieve- ment. English Language Teaching 12 (1), 134­153.

Kember, D. (2009). Promoting Student­Centred Forms of Learning Across an Entire University. Higher Ed- ucation, 58, 1­13.

Kirchmeyer, C. (1998). Determinants of managerial career success: Evidence and explanation of male/ female differences. J. Manag. 24, 673­692.

Kumar, D. M. (2016). Challenges of Implementing Student­centered Strategies in Classrooms. Internation- al Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 1224­1227.

Lavoie, D. a. (2007). Using Active Student­Centred Learning­Based Instructional Design to Develop Faculty and Improve Course Design, Delivery, and Evaluation. Issues in Accounting Education, 22:1, 105­118.

Muianga, X. J., Barbutiu, S. M., & Hansson, H. (2019). Teachers' perspectives on professional development in the use of SCL approaches and ICT: A quantitative case study of Eduardo Mondlane University, Mo- zambique. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT) Vol. 15, Issue 2, 79­97.

Parasuraman, S., Purohit, Y., Godshalk, V., & Beutell, N. (1996). Work and Family Variables, Entrepreneurial Career Success, and Psychological Well­Being. J. Vocat. Behav. 48, 275­300.

Pellert, A. ( 2009). Organisational Development and Promoting Change: the Deeper Dimensions of the Bologna Process’. In EUA Bologna Handbook: Making Bologna Work, C.1.7­1 (pp. 1­20).

Rother, E. T. (2007). Systematic literature review X narrative review. acta paulista de enfermagem, v­vi. Sablonnière, R. d., Taylor, D. M., & Sadykova, N. (2009). Challenges of applying a student­centered ap-

proach to learning in the context of education in Kyrgyzstan. International Journal of Educational De- velopment, 1­7.

Schweisfurth, M., & Elliott, J. (2019). When ‘best practice’ meets the pedagogical nexus: recontextualisa- tion, reframing and resilience. Comparative Education 55(1), 1­8.

Seibert, S., Crant, J., & Kraimer, M. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. J. Appl. Psychol. 84, 416­427.

Spangler, W. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta­anal- yses. Psychol. Bull. 112, 140–154.

Stoffle, C., & Cuillier, C. (2010). Student Centred Service and Support: A Case Study of Arizona Libraries Information Commons. Journal of Library Administration, 50, 117­134.

Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering Critical Thinking through Effective Pedagogy: Evidence from Four Institutional Case Studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 73:6, 740­763.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner­Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey­Bass.

Wulf, C. (2017). "From Teaching to Learning": Characteristics and Challenges of a Student­Centered Learn- ing Culture. In H. A. Mieg, Inquiry­Based Learning – Undergraduate Research; The German Multidisci- plinary Experience (pp. 47­55). SpringerOpen.

გოგსაძე, გ. (2015). სტუდენტზე ორიენტირებული საუნივერსიტეტო განათლების ხელშეწყობა. თბილისი: https://www.tsu.ge/data/file_db/xarisxis_martvis_dep/studentze­orinetirebuli.pdf.